Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00545
Original file (BC 2013 00545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00545
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the 
Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM).

2.  His DD Form 214, be corrected to reflect award of the Air 
Force Overseas Ribbon-Short Tour (AFOR-ST).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His DD Form 214 does not reflect the KDSM and the AFOR-ST.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 2 Jul 56, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force and 
served on active duty until 1 Jul 60 and was honorably 
discharged.  He was credited with 9 years, 10 months, and 8 days 
of total active service, to include 1 year, 10 months and 
14 days of Foreign Service.  Additionally, he was credited with 
6 years, 1 month, and 19 days of other service.

In a letter dated 4 Dec 13, AFPC/DPSIRP notified the applicant 
that his military personnel records were destroyed in the fire 
at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the 
KDSM, indicating they are unable to verify the applicant served 
in Korea for the required time period.  They also recommend 
denial of the AFOR-ST, indicating the applicant separated from 
active duty several years before the AFOR was authorized; 
therefore he is not qualified for this award.

The applicant provided travel orders for travel to Japan from 
APO 970, which DPSID verified as Korea dated 11 Mar 57, and a 
supply form dated 26 Jul 57, issuing him an M-1 Carbine; 
however, the travel voucher which authenticates the travel order 
and details exact dates and locations the applicant served was 
not provided or located within the applicant's limited military 
personnel record.
The AFOR was authorized by the Chief of Staff, United States Air 
Force, on 12 Oct 80.  The ribbon was authorized to be awarded to 
Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion 
of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80.  Only individuals 
serving on active duty as of 6 Jan 86 are eligible to have the 
AFOR applied retroactively for completion of an overseas tour.

The KDSM is awarded to service members who were permanently 
assigned, attached, or detailed to a unit that operated within 
all land area of Korea, and the contiguous water out to 
12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land and water 
areas, and must have been physically deployed in the area of 
eligibility for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days 
between 28 Jul 54 and a future date to be determined by the 
Secretary of Defense.


The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 19 May 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice with respect to 
the applicant’s request for the AFOR-ST.  We took notice of the 
applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of this 
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of 
the Air Force Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) and adopt 
its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. In view of the 
above we find no basis to grant the relief sought in this 
portion of his application.
4.  Notwithstanding the above, sufficient relevant evidence has 
been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or 
injustice to warrant award of the KDSM.  We note the comments of 
DPSID indicating they were unable to verify the applicant served 
in Korea for the required time period.  However, after a 
thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s 
complete submission, we believe relief is warranted.  In this 
respect, we note the applicant provides a travel order dated 
11 Mar 57 to Japan from the 1246th Airways and Air Communications 
Service Squadron (AACSS), APO 970, which DPSID verified as 
Korea.  Additionally, the applicant provides an AF Form 448, 
Issue Slip, dated 26 Jul 57, from the 1246th AACSS issuing him an 
M-1 Carbine.  Although there is no travel voucher to 
authenticate the exact dates and locations the applicant served, 
we find the evidence presented sufficient to conclude that he 
more likely than not served in Korea for at least 30 days.  As 
such, we recommend the applicant be awarded the KDSM.  
Therefore, in the interest of justice, we recommend his records 
be corrected to the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was 
awarded the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM).
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00545 in Executive Session on 9 Oct 14, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	                   , Panel Chair
	                   , Member
	                   , Member





All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00545 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Jan 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 13 May 13.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 May 13.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02610

    Original file (BC 2013 02610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for the VSM, RVGC w/P, PUC, VCM, KSM, NATO Medal, Cold War Medal, AFOR-L and AFOR-S. DPSID was unable to locate any documentation in the applicant’s records verifying he served in Vietnam or an area of eligibility for award of the VSM, RVGC w/P or VCM. In regards to the list of medals and unit awards, he was seeking help in finding out whether any...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03488

    Original file (BC-2011-03488.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Air Force and Air Force Reserve members serving as of 6 January 1986, or later are entitled to reflect all Air Force overseas tours credited during their career. The applicant states, he was discharged from the Air Force after completing nine months versus two years of active service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03170

    Original file (BC-2002-03170.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    (See Exhibit C.) On 21 Nov 02, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant that in order to receive the ROK WSM, veterans must have served in the country of Korea, its territorial waters or airspace during the period 25 Jun 50 - 27 Jul 53. (See Exhibit C.) _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR advises that the dates and location of the applicant’s overseas assignment are not on the DD Form 214, as this information was not included on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03521

    Original file (BC 2013 03521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA) (will be administratively corrected). He believes his Foreign Service time and alert duty time should be enough to confirm he accumulated the 24-month requirement needed for eligibility for award of the CRM. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03521 in Executive Session on 27 May 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04451

    Original file (BC-2012-04451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The ribbon was awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00460

    Original file (BC 2014 00460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial for award of the AFCM, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. However, the date on the applicant’s letter of commendation falls outside of the dates when a letter of commendation could be converted to an AFCM; therefore, he is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01667

    Original file (BC 2013 01667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect all awards and decorations, to include the Air Force Overseas Ribbon—Short Tour (AFOR-ST), which was inadvertently excluded. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial in regards to the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05562

    Original file (BC 2013 05562.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In addition, he provides a personal note to the Board in which he claims he followed the travel orders, but the units he was assigned to at Kirtland Air Force Base, NM and Korea have both been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00080

    Original file (BC-2010-00080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be awarded the Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Long Tour (AFOR-LT). Before 6 Jan 86, the ribbon was awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. Before 6 Jan 86, the ribbon was awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04761

    Original file (BC 2013 04761.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFOR-ST is awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...